Wednesday, December 31, 2008

2008 in review

2008 has been a historic year. For me, it has been a mediocre year. In January, I bought my first high-definition television set, then I was blocked from on feminist grounds. Super Smash Bros. Brawl, a popular game I have boycotted, was released in March 2008. Then I successfully contested my account block at I bought a Sony PlayStation 3 console and Microsoft Office 2007 on the third Sunday of April, then found out that I was banned from, the worst message board I was banned from, on feminist grounds. I was shocked about the Mega Man 9 scheme, which may cause a disturbing trend, putting my passion for video games at stake. On the last Saturday in July, my brother got remarried in Martinsville, Virginia. Then I watched the 2008 Beijing Olympic games on my HDTV set, witnessing Michael Phelps' phenomenal performance, and the U.S. basketball teams' victories over the Chinese teams and their gold medal victories over Spain and Australia. I supported President-elect Barack Obama in the 2008 Presidential Election, because of John McCain's Vice Presidential running mate Sarah Palin, and because of McCain's television ads being proven false, and because McCain has the same doctrine and policies as incumbent President George W. Bush. McCain voted Bush 95% of the time in 2008. I bought an Xbox 360 for Christmas, with Square Enix RPGs Infinite Undiscovery and The Last Remnant.

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

My favorite video game franchises

My top 10 video game franchises are:

10. Star Fox - favorite game: Star Fox Adventures

9. Castlevania - favorite game: Castlevania: The Dracula X Chronicles

8. Front Mission - favorite game: (the jury is still out on that)

7. Seiken Densetsu (Mana) - favorite game: Seiken Densetsu 3

6. Dragon Quest - favorite game: Dragon Quest III

5. SaGa - favorite game: (the jury is still out on that)

4. Fire Emblem - favorite game: Fire Emblem: Seisen no Keifu

3. Star Wars - favorite game: Star Wars: Empire at War

2. SimCity / Cities XL - favorite game: SimCity 4

1. Final Fantasy - favorite game: Final Fantasy X

Sunday, December 28, 2008

TZ doctrine tenet #16: You must not feed the dragon

The "dragon" is the nickname for the People's Republic of China, the country I hate the most. The People's Republic of China is the most oppressive and pollutive country in the world. The country is the worst human rights abuser in the world. The Chinese police act and have always acted against their own people as well as the Tibetans. They have committed crimes against humanity, including false legislation, illegal incarcerations, and executions.

The 2008 Beijing Summer Olympic games is 100% propaganda and is similar to the 1936 Berlin Summer Olympic games. The Chinese Communist Party is analogous to the National Socialist Workers (Nazi) Party of Germany.

The People's Republic of China is known for its absolute intolerance for political dissent, just like Nazi Germany. Political dissidents and Falun Gong practitioners are treated like criminals. The Chinese Communist party routinely arrests and incarcerates them, usually for long periods of time and without trial. Among them, there are wide reports of brutal torture, forced confessions, and forced labor. Freedom of assembly and association is severely limited.

I detest the Chinese Communist Party for the following reasons:

  • Legislation based on false claims and allegations
  • Cracking down on political dissent
  • Cracking down on beneficial or therapeutic lifestyles (such as Falun Gong)
  • Censoring access to information needed for political dissent
  • Imposing capital punishment for minor offenses
  • Imposing capital punishment on children
  • False executions
  • Exporting dangerous goods to Western countries
  • Willfulling orphaning children
  • Willfulling taking adult children away from parents

More people are executed in the People's Republic of China than the rest of the world combined. The People's Republic of China imposes the death penalty for the most crimes of any country on planet Earth, including several crimes that would be punished as misdemeanors if they were committed in the United States or Great Britain. Official statistics claim that 470 people are executed in 2007, but the real figure is as high as 10,000.

Children of the executed are cursed and ignored by the communities, and they are abused or enslaved in child labor. They often lose both of their parents in execution. Children who are orphaned by execution never get good jobs or attend college. The government has executed their parents behind children's backs.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Christmas is here

Members of my childhood religion Jehovah's Witnesses do not celebrate Christmas. They believe that Jesus Christ was not born on December 25. They dismiss Christmas as a pagan holiday. In fact, Jehovah's Witnesses hardly celebrate anything. I first celebrated Christmas last year, and I felt inexperienced. I attended a Christmas dance party at the time. I bought a PSP for last Christmas, and an Xbox 360 for this Christmas. I witnessed Christmas celebrations on the job as well. The name Christmas is also abbreviated Xmas. In the same pattern, the last name of the actor who portrayed in Anakin Skywalker in the Star Wars prequel trilogy could be abbreviated the same way, like Xensen (but pronounced as spelled out). I was spending time online on the night before Christmas. The song "This Christmas" was originally recorded by Donny Hathaway, and it has been covered by many artists, including American Idol contestants Elliott Yamin and David Hernandez.

Friday, December 5, 2008

TZ Doctrine tenet #11: No more female superiority or institutionalized misandry

Feminists claim they are for gender equality, but in reality (as their actions clearly show), they are for female superiority. The equality they are asserting is equality of outcome, not equality of rights. Equality of outcome usually means reverse discrimination. The sex discrimination laws are not about gender equality. They are about female superiority. Female superiority, or female privilege, is defined as preferential treatment for women and the belief that women are superior to men, and discrimination based on that belief. I certainly condemn female superiority and anti-male double standards. By means of deception and dishonesty, feminists seek special privileges for women, produce misandric propaganda, induce misandristic double standards, and push for misandric legislation. Our society teaches that discrimination against men is acceptable but that discrimination against women is not. This is a misandristic double standard, and it is characteristic of the "affirmation action" issue. That is one-sided and evil, and that is what feminism is. Feminism is going for female superiority under the guise of gender equality. By design, men are the disadvantaged sex today, not women. The male sex has been shortchanged in health, in education, in matters of childcare, and in criminal justice. There have been anti-male double standards in infidelity, domestic violence, belief systems, and the media. Men are discriminated against by design through what feminists call "affirmative action." We masculists call it mandated/legislated bias against men, or institutionalized misandry. Women need families, not so-called "Equal Protection." Feminists publicly detest fatherhood.  Women deserve equal opportunity, not equal outcome.  Therefore, institutionalized misandry is a human rights issue in the United States, Great Britain, and Australia.  This is worse in Australia than in the United States.  The female sex did not earn privilege through achievements, a vision, and intrinisic merit, it acquired privilege through deception and dishonesty. 

The education system put and have always put a great effort into encouraging students from lower demographic groups and from different races. However, the only area the education system has shied away from is none other than gender balance. That is because people believe that female superiority is politically correct. Academic statistics indicate that the male sex is the disadvantaged sex in education. Male students have been shortchanged in these education systems from primary school to college, because of feminist ideology. By design, female students achieve higher in school than their male counterparts from primary school to college.  According to feminists, the underachievement of male students indicates a reversal in the gender gap in education, and as a result about 60% of college students are female. Solving the original "problem" created a new problem in the process. Women closed the original gender gap in education due to social pressure to attend college rather than because it fits their path in life. When female students achieve higher than male students, feminists attribute this to the alleged superior ability to communicate, thus calling it "victory." When vice versa, feminist attribute this to systematic discrimination that must be remedied, or "something to be corrected." When female students do better, there are celebrations everywhere, but when male students do better, someone wants to somehow aid the female students to do better.  That is institutionalized misandry, and that is the dark side of feminism, and that makes feminism a hate movement. Discrimination against boys is the low road and will not improve girls' intellectual status. The feminization of the classroom is another thing. Boys thrive in competition: Every boy who has played sports and lost the game knows how "good game" rings hollow, even they played their best. However, schools now have social promotion, that no one fails. Because of that, boys have lost interest in education. The current academic arrangement favors female students, because it practices theoretical learning rather than visual or kinesthetic learning. Female students get preferential treatment from teachers or professors. This gender gap in education is being obscured and ignored by the government and the media. I have had enough of the same failed and anti-male biased education system. We must take action to reverse this trend in education. Feminists have hijacked the American and British education systems. These current education systems produce the world's worst students at one of the highest education costs on Earth. Feminists love to see female students do better in the academic world than male students because the vast majority of women would prefer to marry men who did better better in the academic world than themselves, for the main purpose of feminism is to break up families. By ensuring that female students out-achieve male students in the academic world, feminists can be assured that millions of potentially long-term relationships between men and women can be terminated before they could even start. This situation must end. 

This may sound "sexist" by feminist dictates but it is true:  It is more important to help boys succeed in the academic playing field than to help girls do so.  This is because feminism is a false and evil ideology, and women prefer men who did better academically than themselves. Thus feminism only serves to promote couple break up.  I do not condone any law or ideology that promotes couple breakup.  Better results for female students, which can only be staged through feminism, leads to family breakup in the future, and ultimately a dark future for America and Great Britain, because female privilege is rank hypocrisy, and thus inherently divisive.  The female sex acquired advantage in education through deception, dishonesty, and political correctness, while the male sex would earn advantage in education through innate positive male attribute.  Therefore, the female sex has cheated in the academic playing field by means of feminist dogma.  This must end now, and that will happen one day.  I dream that one day, the education system will be corrected so that neither gender will have a clear advantage over the other.  I have a dream that one day, boys and girls will be educated equally.

Criminal justice

Women must be held as accountable as men. Men are being held accountable for their actions, but women are to be treated as superior citizens who are entitled to privileges and benefits solely for the sake of their gender. Women are treated like spoiled babies, pampered constantly regarding their wishes, with the justice system being completely corrupted and debased to help them succeed with their false and selfish claims with no merit. The American justice system is anti-male biased by design. By design, due to feminist jurisprudence, men are more likely to be accused of a crime and be incarcerated or executed. Men are murdered four times as much as women. Men committ suicide five times as often as women. American men are accused of rape 135 times as much as Greek men and 231 times as much as Japanese men. 33% of American men convicted of rape do not match the DNA found at the actually crime scenes. Juries acquit women five times as often as they acquit men. Once they are convicted of a crime, men are 16% more likely to be incarcerated than women. Once incarcerated, men receive harsher punishment than women for the exact same crime at exact same degree. When women kill their partners and children, they are mostly not held accountable. When there is domestic violence in the home, women are not held accountable.

An increase in female judges means higher male incarceration rate, higher homicide rate, and higher rate of false accusations of domestic violence. Before women entered the law field, America had murder and incarceration rates lower than Canada, Denmark, France, Spain, and Portugal, and the same rates as Germany and Australia. Since women entered the law field, the incarceration and illegitimacy rates increased by 400%. The rates of murder, male suicide, and divorce rates increased by 200%. 20,000 laws afoul of the Second Amendment were implemented. Every principle of the United States Constitution has been violated. The Nineteenth Amendment caused this to happen.

If women achieve equality in justice, there would be many more American women than men in prison. The exact same corrupt justice system that is prosecuting men for "discriminating against women" is practicing this heinous act of discrimination against men. This low-road justice system must be replaced with a new, male-friendly justice system immediately. Here is the graph that will you tell you why.


In this day and age, absolutely all feminist initiatives about giving women rights over men and men responsibility over women; that is utter politically correct nonsense. We have employment equity for traditionally male jobs but none for traditionally female jobs.  We must say "Yes" to equality for both genders and "No" to privilege for either gender.

The notion that the American or British woman is a powerless 'victim' is one of the most deceptive notions ever hammered into people's minds, and that is an anti-male double standard. American and British women live, on average, seven years longer than men. They control 86% of all personal wealth, constitute 55% of college graduates, and cast 54% of votes in U.S. Presidential elections. Women are the victim of only 35% of violent crimes and 25% of homicides, and yet because of American and British society's exaggerated concern and respect for women, special legislation was enacted in 1994 to crack down on 'violence against women' as if it were more heinous than 'violence against men'. Such legislation is another anti-male double standard. Two thirds of all money spent on medical care is spent on female health. Women receive far more medical care than men, when it is really men who are disadvantaged in medical care.

The face of feminism has changed beyond recognition.  It has degenerated from liberalism to political correctness and from a demand for gender equality to a cry for female privilege.  Feminists sincerely believe that they seek gender equality, but by their actions, they are actually seeking female superiority, which is defined as preferential treatment for women. What "equality" means to them is preferential treatment. It is to regress women into the state of childhood, which is rights without responsibilities and consumption without production. Feminists use deception and shame to get their way in society. Deception in this case comes in the form of distorted and fraudulent statistics (such as studies indicating that most domestic violence is perpetrated by men and that women are the innocent victims but ignores the fact that women initiate the most domestic violence and are just as domestically violent as men, and studies indicating that women continue to earn less wages than men but ignores the differences in hours worked, years of experience, overtime, and credentials).

We must recognize the truth about the social system we live in. It is like recognizing the truth about our families. Female superiority and empowerment are a hoax. Feminism, female superiority, and female empowerment have very many facts stacked up against them. Only a subverted nation empowers its female population at the expense of its male population. Female empowerment leads to breakdown of heterosexual relationship and family. It is the healthy and natural instinct for the vast majority of young women to get married and bear children in order to perpetuate society. It is unwise to encourage young women to pursue high-powered careers before establishing families. Doing so does them and society an intentional injustice. A woman married to a powerful man is a match made in heaven, but a man in love with a powerful woman is a match made in hell.

Anti-male double standards are also conducted in complaints on the media. FHM magazine is considered sexist for having female models in their pants, while Cosmopolitan magazine has male models in their pants and is considered fine. That mentality is an an anti-male double standard, which is a form of female superiority, and politically correct nonsense. That complaining practice must end. There is also a double standard between video games and other media forms. Sex and certain image portrayal are condoned in movies and television, but are frowned upon in video games. That is a classic example of a double standard between video games and other media. Video games are meant to be enjoyed for the reasons they were developed, and they do not need to please the extreme left and right and churn politically correct nonsense from every pixel and polygon to have it accepted by society. I do not condone anti-male double standards or double standards between video games and other media forms, and neither should you.

The war against feminism is unavoidable. One day, this evil in our culture will become a thing of the past. I have a dream that one day, there will be no more female students designedly outperforming male students in the academic world, thus no more couple breakup. We must take action to end politically correct nonsense.  I have a dream that one day boys and girls will score equally in the academic playing field.  I have a dream that one day men and women will be held equally accountable for their actions.  I have a dream that one day socially constructed female privilege will be a relic of the past.

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Fire Emblem Sanctuary of Strategy closes down

The Fire Emblem message board, Fire Emblem: Sanctuary of Strategy (FESS) has closed down. I was a member of that board briefly four years ago. I was prematurely banned on feminist grounds and that I was declared a polarizing figure who could not get along with the forum community. That is not what I am. I frequented FESS for news about Fire Emblem as well as Fire Emblem related files. Fire Emblem is my favorite Nintendo game series.

TZ doctrine tenet #10: Feminism is based on lies

Feminism is politically correct but factually incorrect. It is deceptive, destructive, dishonest, divisive, and expensive. The purpose of this blog is to abolish totalitarian ideologies, such as feminism. More often than not, society has patronizingly protected women rather than men. Countless scientific researches indicate that feminism is based on lies, false allegations, and fraudulent statistics. Feminism is a political hate movement that has damaged societies, not an equality movement. The true agenda of feminism is to achieve female superiority under the guise of gender equality, to break up heterosexual relationships, to transform America into a feminist police state, and conspire to destroy mankind. It puts ideology before reality. It is based on the lie that females are powerless victims of patriarchal oppression and that marriage is slavery for women. It is a false, destructive, and divisive ideology. The most pathetic of all tenets of feminist ideology is accusation that antifeminists are misogynists. Feminists hate people like me and presume that we hate all women back. Claiming that anyone who criticizes feminism is a misogynist is like claiming that anyone who criticizes Maoism hates Chinese people. It was relevant in the 20th century, but it is no longer relevant today in the 21st century.

Feminism is a hate movement disguised as an equality movement, hence a Trojan-horse movement. A hate movement is defined as a movement that advocates lesser rights in law for a target demographic group and advocates and/or propagates discrimination against that group. A hate group teaches that the targeted group is a threat and that the group is inherently inferior and immoral. A hate group uses lies including historical revisionism and statistical fraud to disseminate those views and condones and endorses violence against members of the targeted group. The male sex is the targeted group of the feminist movement. If a movement is pursuing objectives that must be disguised, then that movement uses devices by which meaningful debate cannot be ignored or deflected. A Trojan-horse movement is defined as a movement with a negative agenda under the guise of positive values.

Here are the ten lies of feminism:
  1. Women have their rights.
  2. Women can have it all.
  3. Women should not have to with unfulfilled longings.
  4. A career outside the home is more valuable and fulfilling than being a wife and mother.
  5. It is all about women.
  6. If the husband is passive then the wife needs to lead.
  7. If a wife submits, she will be miserable.
  8. Women have to have _____ to make them happy.
  9. Children are a hindrance and burden.
  10. Women are smarter than men.
Those lies are the most common in 21st century culture than most American and British women are frequently bombarded with. These lies are one of the most dangerous lies ever and they debilitate the family unit in one way or another.

Feminism has three basic strategies:
  1. Where there is a difference in a society between male and female roles, feminists ignore the real causes and disguise the difference always as evidence of patriarchal oppression and discrimination against women and demand compensatory programs.
  2. Where there is no difference between male and female roles, or such differences as do exist in favor of the female sex, feminists create false or distorted studies and statistics to argue that the female sex is the disadvantaged sex. They claim that difference as evidence of male oppression and demand compensatory programs (such as female health and domestic violence against women). If necessary, feminists introduce "violence against women and children" as an emotional trump card to silence the debate of real issues, like false allegations of domestic violence and male academic disadvantage.
  3. Feminists are quick to silence anyone who opposes or criticizes feminist claims or isolate them through shame, by accusing them of "backlash", which is of being opposed to the equality of women, in order to maintain their own egotistic, oppressive conduct. On some message boards, such as, users who oppose or criticize feminist claims get banhammered.
These strategies show that feminism puts ideology ahead of truth. Feminism is a false, costly, disastrous, and totalitarian ideology. It is bad for society, and it is an unsustainable and dangerous ideology. It contradicts with reality through dishonest rationalizations. It conspires against mankind, increases divorce rates, and burdens the government. It has played a significant role in causing serious violence and hooliganism, assault, domestic violence, sexual offenses, robbery, child abuse, drug abuse, teenage romance, poverty, poor academic standards, poor male academic achievement, prostitution, school massacres, gang life, pedophilia, harassment, bad manners, traffic congestion, road rage, pollution, terrorism, vandalism, burglary, murder, juvenile delinquency, alcoholism and other addictions, depression, gender division, hysteria, stress, serious diseases and disorders, long hospital waiting lists and overcrowded hospitals, AIDS, miscarriage of justice and false criminal accusations, needless malum prohibitum laws, overflowing prison population, family division, alienation of men, corruption of the justice system and democratic process, corrosion of academic integrity, degradation of social sciences and the law, false legislation, poor public services, impoverishment of pensioners and pension crisis, excessive immigration, censorship, high tax rates, thousands of women discovering that they are beyond childbearing age, and global warming.

For taxes, as much as US$97 billion a year which would have been in Personal Savings is paid by men directly to the IRS who sends it directly to women to subsidize single motherhood. About US$500 billion has been transferred from working men to finance mother-only households. The "graduated income tax" places men in high tax brackets and women in low tax brackets. Working wives reduce the taxes paid by families by US$35.8 billion. It takes 14 male employees to compensate for negative productivity of a female employee.

Our government is embracing feminism and subsidizing mother-only households through taxes withheld from working men. 75% of men in prison were raised in mother-only households. The most infamous murderers were also raised in mother-only households. Mother-only households are more dangerous than guns. Making just one more mother-only household costs society over a million US dollars. In the end, feminism is more dangerous than guns. It is worse and more expensive than warfare. The cost of feminism outweighs the economic benefits of female employment.

Feminism is a complete lie, and we do not want anymore of it. We do not want another decade of the same failed culture, medical system, education system, or justice system that is prejudiced against men. Feminism is more heinous than terrorism. Feminists are intent on hating and shortchanging men and distort the truth to condition them to feel bad about being men. We must realize the deleterious effects on feminism. The so-called "politcally correct" hypocrites are either too ignorant to realize the casual relationship between feminism and several evils or are too deceptive and manipulate to discuss it. I am concerned about the ecosystem, and that makes me detest the feminists and their unreasonable and deceptive supporters. Today's feminists (like those I met at, who I call radical feminists, do nothing but deceive (just like Senator John McCain did in his attack ads against President-elect Barack Obama). We must realize that feminism does far more harm than intended good.

150 years ago, the feminist movement was conceived by the destructive notion that American women's individual problems were part of systematic social problems. Radical feminists have believed that women were on an ongoing and total struggle with men, and that social change would only occur if the American fabric is completely flipped. Feminists claim portray women as equal to men, but by their actions, they portray women as superior to men and as helpless victims of male-perpetrated oppression and demanding new legislation to advance their agenda.

Female empowerment is a cruel and divisive hoax. It leads to breakdown of heterosexual relationship and family. It is the healthy and natural instinct for the vast majority of young women to get married and bear children in order to perpetuate society. Encouraging young women to pursue high-powered careers before establishing families does them and society an intentional injustice. A relationship between an ordinary woman and a powerful man is a match made in heaven. A relationship between an ordinary man and a powerful woman is a match made in hell. When women challenge and overthrow male leadership, relationships break up, divorce rates escalate, and the age marriageability increases, and there will be more illegitimate children. The purpose of female empowerment is to dissolve the nuclear family and to increase dependency on the government and the media, which are under Illuminati control.

American and British women, who comprise of a tiny percentage of the Earth's population, have been indoctrinated with the view that feminism has brought great benefits to society, but in reality, feminism has brought no benefits to society at all. Feminism is a false ideology that instigates self-extinction of the human race. It is a recipe for cultural and societal suicide. It has no hope of success or survival. Finally, it is going to cause huge problems to American and British societies as they slowly continue to rot and decline under its divisive, malignant, and destructive influences. Feminism has hampered the progress of both genders in a large number of central aspects of their lives, such as health, education, and criminal justice. It is the things that men are responsible for such as science, technology, and medicine, that have brought American and British women the liberties that they currently enjoy, not feminism.
"Destroy the family, you destroy the country." — V.I. Lenin
Feminism is the one of the most subtly socially destructive movements in world history. It is hugely destructive and divisive to societies that follow it. It is a hate movement against men, wives, mothers with sons, and against the idea of giving and receiving. Most people in the West defend feminism only because they are brainwashed and do not know any better. I am against feminism, because I have researched it and found its claims have been exposed as a lie. These evil, angry, intolerant, hypersensitive, pro-censorship socialist feminists have hijacked the education system, the news and entertainment media, and the Internet. They have been exerting undue evil influence in legislation and law enforcement, and they are slowly and subtly transforming America and Great Britain into feminist police states. They are seeking to dictate expression, violate the First Amendment, invade schools and businesses, and censor those who oppose their ideology. I had enough of the words "sexist" and "misogynist" being thrown at me or my antifeminist allies. The word "sexist" is basically a swear word; that word and the word "misogynist" are just political slurs that feminists learned to use when they encounter content they or their mentors believe to be "politically incorrect" according to their false, intolerant standards. Until people reject feminism, it will continue to divide families, degrade and depopulate nations, and destroy the bond between the male sex and the female sex. Finally, societies that have given into its teachings will last only a short time only to be overthrown by those wherein women prefer to be homebound and have children.

Feminism sidetracks from living a life for Jesus Christ and doing all we can for His glory and instead creates false gods that our society worships in secret, thus a violation of the First Commandment. Feminist propaganda is disseminated everywhere in schools, colleges, books, television, magazines, motion pictures, music, peers, billboards, role models, and the Internet. Feminism has taken away from Christianity and America. Women must stop listen to or believing the fatal lies of feminism and other false political correctness and turn to the this doctrine in the this blog. I do not hate women; I just want to redeem the female sex.

Here are the ten lies of feminism according to Sue Bohlin:

Lie #1: Women Can Have It All
Lie #2: Men and Women Are Fundamentally the Same
Lie #3: Desirability Is Enhanced By Achievement
Lie #4: The Myth of One's "Unrealized Potential"
Lie #5: Sexual Sameness
Lie #6: The Denial of Maternity
Lie #7: To Be Feminine Is to Be Weak
Lie #8: Doing Is Better Than Being
Lie #9: The Myth of Self Sufficiency
Lie #10: Women Would Enjoy the Feminization of Men

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

A Historic American Night

The historic 2008 Presidential election is officially over. With the popular vote of 63,347,102, and the electoral vote of 364, ABC network has projected that Barack Hussein Obama II will be the 44th President of the United States. Obama has been dubbed the first African American President of the United States. I myself am an Obama supporter. Through the campaign, I watched the Obama Website and received E-mails from Obama, his wife Michelle, his Vice-President running mate Joseph Robinette "Joe" Biden, Jr., and the Obama campaign manager David Plouffe. I also watched the Obama campaign Website. The Obama campaign was funded by none other than the American people. Meanwhile, Biden has been declared the first Roman Catholic Vice President of the United States in U.S. history. His Senatorial predecessor was J. Caleb Boggs.

Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on August 4, 1961. He married Michelle LaVaughn Robinson in 1992. Maila Ann and Sasha Obama will be declared the new First Daughters. Obama attended Occidental College, Columbia University, and Harvard Law School. He is affiliated with the United Church of Christ.

With a popular vote of 56,009,353 and an electoral vote of 174, John Sidney McCain III has already conceded the election. He led a low-road campaign run and funded by corporate lobbyists. Sarah Palin's lack of experience has cost her the bid to be the first female Vice President of the United States. I have just heard McCain's concession speech as well as Obama's inaugural speech. Biden is McCain's old friend. McCain's attack ads against Obama were all proven false. He voted with lame-duck President George W. Bush 90% of the time. Electing McCain would be like electing Bush a third term.

Meanwhile, Democrats gained seats in both the House and the Senate. This has happened locally on WLOS channel 13, an ABC affiliate broadcast to my locality, when Kay Hagan defeated Republican incumbent Elizabeth Dole, who lost the Republican Primary in the controversial 2000 Presidential Election. Also, Bev Perdue has been elected the first female Governor of North Carolina in U.S. history. Both Independents in Congress have ties with the Democratic Party.

Both major Presidential candidates were born outside the continental United States. Obama was born in Hawaii and McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone.

Obama turned blue six states that went red in 2004. He claimed Pennsylvania (which McCain heavily focused on his campaign), Ohio (which got an 80% blue turnout), and Virginia, spelling doom for McCain. Virginia previously went blue in 1964. Recent shifts in Virginia's demographics may have helped him win this election. If Ohio goes blue, the red campaign is doomed. A Democratic victory in Ohio spells and has always spelled doom for the Republican candidate. No Republican won a Presidential election without claiming Ohio.

Friday, October 31, 2008

TZ doctrine tenet #9: Women must not press false charges against men

Far too many women have been getting away with murder. The feminist notion that women were oppressed in the West is false and only serves to stir up misandry. That is one of the false premises that feminism is based on. Conventional wisdom, especially in the United States and Great Britain in the 21st century, teaches that in domestic violence cases men are the perpetrators and women are the victims. The truth is that men and children are also victims of domestic violence, and that women are usually the initiators. The media and the feminists claim that men are always the perpetrators of domestic violence and that women are always the victims. They claim that domestic violence perpetrator by men against women is at an all-time high and increasing. However, in reality, that is false according to scientific research.

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is a law that discriminates against male victims of violence by denying them equal protection. It is a significant step forward in feminism in the mid 1990s. VAWA is obviously and intentionally anti-male, as the name implies. VAWA is the smoking gun to prove that feminism is a political hate movement, not an equality movement. It supports the feminist claim that it is acceptable to discriminate against men, which is absolutely unacceptable to me. It also costs billions of taxpayer dollars. It has not lived up to its original purpose.

Blaming the male sex will not solve the domestic violence issue. Restraining orders have turned out to be swords rather than shields. Fathers have become strangers to their children, not voluntarily, but by legal force. Domestic violence is a family issue, not a gender issue. Gender politics must be separated from this issue.  Attributing a societal issue to one gender over the other is misleading and hinders efforts to address the issue.

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is out of hand for 12 reasons:
  • VAWA has failed to stop abuse.
  • VAWA provides incentives for false allegations and family divisions.
  • VAWA has not delivered on its promises to women.
  • VAWA disseminates one-sided and gender biased information.
  • VAWA allows states to broaden the definition of domestic violence to include virtually all types of family disagreement, even shouting.
  • VAWA promotes immigration fraud.
  • VAWA encourages issuing police restraining orders, even when there is no evidence of physical violence.
  • VAWA funds destructive mandatory arrest policies.
  • VAWA biases the judiciary.
  • VAWA condones mismanagement of federal government money.
  • VAWA costs taxpayers $20 billion annually to aid at-risk children who are harmed by family division.
  • VAWA illegally discriminates against male victims of domestic violence.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

TZ doctrine tenet #7: No more false legislation or accusation

America has been saddled with a ton of bad laws. A bad law is defined as a law based on lies, false allegations, junk science, or dishonest statistics. A good law is defined as a law based on truth, true allegations, sound science, or honest statistics. Good laws are catered to the common people. Bad laws are catered to special interests. Bad laws are the bane of freedom. Bad legislation means tough time for freedom of speech.

Good laws should be obeyed, but bad laws should be challenged. Laws derived from the Rockefeller-based elite are bad laws paved with good intentions. Good intentions do not necessarily make good laws. Most good legislation comes from liberals. Most bad legislation paved with good intentions comes from conservatives. One-sided feminist laws are bad laws. Racial equality laws are good laws, while Jim Crow laws were bad laws. Laws against drugs are bad laws. The government should not intervene against people's actions unless they impede upon the rights of others. Bad laws cost America billions of dollars and led to incarceration of millions of otherwise law-abiding people.

Bad cases make bad laws, and celebrity cases often reinforce age-old myths. The biggest myth is that the high-profile O.J. Simpson case is likely to reinforce the myth that domestic violence is a one-way street (male against female) and its corollary that male-perpetrated domestic violence is an outgrowth of masculinity. This myth is a big distortion. The truth is that domestic violence is a two-way street, not a one-way street. Like church and state, gender politics must be separated from the domestic violence issue. Female-perpetrated domestic violence is more rampant than people think.

Part of the dark side of feminism is that feminist laws, which can be bad laws, can erode freedom of speech. You must not put gender equality ahead of freedom of speech. The right to portray women in whatever way the media industry wants should hold precedence over the right to object to it. Gender politics must be separated from media controversy. Remember the words of Milton Friedman:
A society that puts equality—in the sense of equality outcome—ahead of freedom will end up with neither equality, nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of the people who use it to promote their own interests. On the other hand, a scoiety that puts freedom first will, as a happy by-product, end up with both greater freedom and greater equality.
Thomas Jefferson, the third President of the United States, stated that the object of good government is the care of human life and happiness, not their destruction. Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the United States, stated that mercy bears better results than strict justice. The Tedius Zanarukando Doctrine makes more sense than the doctrine of the mainstream, despite what as those feminists believe.

Legislation based on false premises or fabricated statistics or such laws that cops enforce will not solve society's problems. Such laws hurt people in many ways, and clog up the courts and prisons with otherwise law-abiding citizens. Laws based on false premises cost millions of dollars a year in taxpayer money, and they divide and destroy families and perpetuate lies and encourage crime.

Friday, October 17, 2008

TZ doctrine tenet #6: Censorship is a dead end

I am strongly against the belief that media violence desensitizes people to aggressive behavior. We have been upset about linking electronic games to acts of violence or other criminal acts. We have been upset about the growing political movement against so-called violent electronic games. We have been upset about the vilification of the video game community by the media, church, and state. The speech will tell you the truth about video games and youth violence and aggression. It is directed toward the governments, the religious sects, and the media pundits. We shall win the government to our side. This speech shall put an end to video game censorship and the vilification of interactive entertainment.

It is a shame that video game players are very poorly looked upon by much of society, especially by the cults and governments. That has happened, not just in the United States. It has happened internationally. They should stop blaming video games for society's problems. I am getting tired of the media, religious cults, and state attacking the video game community. The video game community has been treated worse than television and motion picture community.

Video games have been used as a scapegoat for acting out violent or heinous crimes, insubordination (or difficulty obeying authorities), difficulty treating peers properly, and academic failure. It is feminism and other extreme political correctness that cause these ills, not video games. Anyone who supports or teaches the belief that violent video games desensitize an otherwise normal, sane-minded person into a violent criminal does not earn my respect, regardless of whether he or she has a title that demands respect.

Video game players are very good and compassionate people, despite the common ecclesiastical (or religious) and governmental (or political) criticism. They are not mindless idiots as the mainstream news media and the church and state think we are. I want to be a hero of the video game community. I am wholly and internationally against religious and governmental restriction and regulation of video games, for such restriction is religious and political nonsense. I am against church-sanctioned and government-sanctioned rating systems. Any desensitization to evil things has to do with incompetency, psychological conflict, and lack of training, not the content of the video games. Any religious organization that restricts video games is either a cult or a totalitarian religious organization (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses and Church of Scientology).

I left Jehovah's Witnesses fundamentally because of their stance on video games, and for influencing me to have misogynous (or anti-female) tendencies. I am rebuilding my life and have conquered misogyny. Theologically, Jehovah's Witnesses are a cult of Christianity and a totalitarian religious organization. Their actually false teachings do not really represent Biblical teachings. Not only I would leave my parents' home, I will also be willing to liberate gamers who are children of Jehovah's Witnesses but do not want to share that religious organization from their parent's home and construct new homes for them.

Jehovah's Witnesses believe that their religious organization is "the only true Christian organization." But it is a cult of Christianity, for they claim that their ideas are from God, but they are from the Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society. Charles Taze Russell was exposed to the teachings of William Miller. The teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses are based on the Seventh Day Adventist Church and the Mennonite Church. Their video game teachings originated from Jack Chick. Jehovah's Witnesses claim to question or counter other religions. The Witnesses' stance on video gaming is far beyond the ESRB, and it is a plague to video game community and its industry.

I disapprove of censorship based on religion and/or political correctness. Any parents whose restrictions are based on the teachings of totalitarian religious organizations or political correctness are enemies of the video game community. Any politician, such as Joseph Isadore Lieberman, who is bent on restricting or regulating video games and those who favorite that stance on video gaming is also an enemy of the video game community.

Those who play video games do so to relax, and stray away from being accused of a crime. Gamers are better people than nongamers. Ex-gamers who gave up games for religion or to support the Liebermanites are traitors against the video game community. If I were to believe in romantic love, I would marry a younger woman who is also a Final Fantasy fan, but not an angry feminist or Jehovah's Witness (a member of my former religion). Older women are usually nongamers. It is not recommended for gamers to marry nongamers. Gamers must not vote for Lieberman or marry anyone who voted for Lieberman. Real gamers do not vote for Lieberman or practice religious organizations that restrict video games. I love the video game community, and I do not want any gamers to face restriction on video games.

Restricting or illegalizing video games, especially by means of outlawing the hobby, and whether entirely or content-wise, is evil, undemocratic, and totalitarian. It is also a violation of the First Amendment of U.S. Constitution. It does not only hurt the video game community and its industry, but it also hurts the economy and leads to unemployment and oppression. Such illegalization turns a democratic country into a brutal dictatorship. It may also destroy the video game community and tarnish the image of the video game industry and the economy.

Banning video games entirely or just because they contain violence, occultism, profanity, or whatever else is controversial, is not the answer, and it is unconstitutional. Such banning is Lieberman's idea. A professor at Nihon University in Japan indicated video gaming increases alpha brain wave activity, which lets gamers get more focused even outside gaming. A similar study indicates that school students who play video games at night or after doing homework, chores, or whatever their parents or guardians require them to do for the day tend to have more associates and make better grades than their nongaming counterparts at a similar grade point ratio.

We are on the side of the video game proponents. Those who oppose the video game community are on the side of the video game barbarians. is neutral in the video game controversy. 2002 is the worst year, not only for me, but also for the video game community.

Playing video games does not only keep us away from trouble, it can also keep a our minds off of the deaths of our loved ones. I am an accidentally hardcore gamer, because I was under intense social denial back in my school age. I play Final Fantasy games or listen to Final Fantasy music itself to heal or empower my emotions, and to make me happy. I gave up my parents' religion, Jehovah's Witnesses, for video games (specifically RPGs). Their religious organization is a cult of Christianity. Its founder Charles Taze Russell was exposed to the teachings of William Miller and borrowed the teachings of the Seventh Day Adventist Church. I also gave up that religious organization to become a hero of the video game community, and I want to support the video game community internationally. I do not want you fellow gamers join that religious organization either, because of their stance on video gaming is too restrictive, robbing of enjoyment of video gaming. I would rather to be a hardcore gamer than to have a romantic relationship with an angry feminist.

We shall see to it that the war of the video game controversy will be won by the video game community. The religious and political enemies of the video game community will one day meet their demise. The video game community shall be in peace and relaxation, without any Liebermanite or fundamentalist interference. A New Liebermanite or New Fundamentalist movement will be strictly forbidden. The hardcore gamers will be well understood. The Greek Law 3037/002 will be repealed, or else the Greek Parliament will face conquest. Video gaming will one day be a cultural phenomenon in almost every country as it is in Japan, and the video game market will expand. Localization will be beefed up.

Those totalitarian religious organizations, such as Jehovah's Witnesses and Church of Scientology, claim that video games cause violation, witchcraft, and degradation of youth, but that is their problem, and it is not so. Those religious organizations are extremist cults. They were exposed to the video game teachings of Jack Chick. So you must not convert to a totalitarian religious organization. Their stance on video gaming is too restrictive and set in detail. They will rob you of video gaming.

I have the Greek Parliament to keep an eye on through the Internet, but I live in the United States. I want to help the Greek gaming community, and march against that Greek Law 3037, which entirely banned electronic gaming. I was shocked that the Greek Parliament has betrayed the video game community with that law. Such law is unconstitutional, and if it lasts too long, it will turn Greece into a brutal dictatorship. Greece was ruled by a brutal dictatorship long ago, and it may happen with Greece again. The Greek video game community has been undergoing hardship with the Greek Parliament since law 3037, enacted in 2002. The hardship is horrible, not only for the Greek video game community, but also the video game community worldwide. We do not want the video game community in any country to suffer oppression, especially electronic game ban. I certainly do not tolerate electronic game bans. Let us save the Greek video game community, guaranteeing them the liberty to play video games. The Greek Parliament will suffer the consequences of enacting law 3037. Warfare would be the last resort. I support the video game community internationally. The Greek electronic game situation is a lesson against electronic game ban. Greece may suffer oppression and economic collapse, and Greek Law 3037 will degenerate into a brutal dictatorship and shedding of the blood of gamers if it does not get repealed, and the Greek Parliament may worsen its detriment against the Greek video game community and face warfare that way. If the Greek Parliament continues to oppress gamers, that regime shall face military invasion.

Video games have recently surpassed motion pictures in popularity, but it is unknown whether they can surpass television in popularity. Video games and the Internet will remain equally popular, for gamers need Internet access to communicate with each other and keep up with the news. Video games will one day replace motion pictures and become as much of a cultural phenomenon in North America and Europe as it is in Japan, and they will sport lush, realistic, true 3D graphics and nicely arranged or orchestrated audio. Video game OSTs from Japan will have their linear notes translated from Japanese to English and come to North America. I am sure RPGs will one day be the dominant video game genre. RPGs are the greater video games, while non-RPGs are the lesser video games. Because classic games are legends, let them be remade for a new audience, but port the original versions also. One day, the oppressive nongamer government will be overthrown, and the video game community will rule the United States, and ultimately the world. The heroes of the video game community will be remembered if any of them die. Let us fight those public video game criticisms and then enjoy those video games to our hearts content until the discs wear out. I would buy many video games myself, for I will rise from a casual gamer to a superhardcore gamer.

We shall rise up against all religious and political video game restriction, criticism, scrutiny, and regulation. We will stop being blinded by religious or political criticism and controversy again and enjoy many video games to our hearts' content until the discs wear out. The video game market will expand as time goes by. We must not judge a video game before playing it. We must give that video game an opportunity for a valid opinion from us. One day, it will be evident that gamers are good and passionate people. Video game criticism will one day be no more, and the Liebermanites will be no more. We should buy video games in order to love and support the video game industry. The video game market should expand to bring about more opportunity to buy video games. I recommend that Game Stops store should open in smaller cities and towns as well as large cities. Square Enix takes care of me and cheers me up with Final Fantasy. I love buying their games for I love Square Enix.

We are getting tired of those video game censors, which include the media-restrictive religious sects and certain politicians, standing in our way and making stereotypes of the gamers. We must march to speak out against gamer criticism.

Much of the creation of stereotypes of gamers is the work of a censor organization called Parents and Grandparents Alliance, Inc., a division of Accuracy in Media. That organization is run by Pat Boone. They are out to drive the youth into a state of eternal tedium (or boredom), not "make the world a better place for the youth." They claim "TV, pop music, movies, and video games are causing children to do sex, violence, drug abuse, and suicide!" They claim that the media industries, including the video game and motion picture industrs, are "guilty of a monstrous evil." They claim that it is the truth. A sample of such argument from that evil censorship organization can be found at this Disinfopedia article. This version did not mention video games, but it is a possible indirect reference to them. I was shocked at recent local newspaper advertisement last Saturday. It is closely similar to a sample like at what I liked aforementionedly, except that they included video games. They were telling lies about the media communities, including us the video game community. We must defend our freedom of expression and protect the video game industry against threats of government and religious censorship.

Those advertisements from Parents and Grandparents Alliance, Inc., have been disseminated in newspapers in July 2001, January 2004, and April 2004. I am well aware of such advertisements from them, and you should be aware of that. Those advertisements are controversial, and agreeing with them is not the way of a gamer. They are horrible and offensive to the media community. They have been castigating the media communities (especially the video game and motion picture communities) by using extreme negative adjectives, probably in a sense to deceive the government. That organization has been accused of campaigning to promote censorship. They are out to suppress everything that is fun and cheering up. Parents and Grandparents Alliance, Inc. must be stopped. They are a group of video game censors. Video game censors are bad and ruthless people, and they, including the Parents and Grandparents Alliance should be punished for their attacks against the video game community. Pat Boone and Joseph Lieberman are evil censors.

Also, as I said before, my parents' religion, Jehovah's Witnesses, is theologically a dangerous and demeaning cult, and a totalitarian religious organization. They are opposed to everything that is fun. Their founder Charles Taze Russell was influenced by the teachings of William Miller and borrowed teachings from the Seventh Day Adventist Church. They believe that those who think that the entertainment does not both them are "deceiving themselves with false reasoning." Is that true, or are they just calling that true? They like to criticize the opponents of censorship and support the censors. Jehovah's Witnesses are obviously too restrictive and defamatory. Joining that religious organization is not the way of a gamer, nor is supporting Pat Boone or Joseph Lieberman, or the other video game censors, or siding with the Parents and Grandparents Alliance. Therefore, disagreeing with me on this thread is not the way of a gamer. Video games have nothing to do with the Columbine High School massacre or the Virginia Tech massacre. Seong-Hui Cho was hardly a gamer.

Patricia Vance, the president of the Entertainment Software Ratings Board, is no stranger to the business end of the rod of the empire of video game censorship. She said that the mainstream news media is choosing facts about electronic gaming in order to show the electronic gaming industry in a negative perspective. Only a small percentage of recently released electronic games are ESRB-rated M for Mature, but that is the type of electronic games the mainstream media, the church, and the state always show when they want to drive home any point about electronic games. Electronic games that are ESRB-rated M for Mature have evidently dominated mainstream media coverage on electronic gaming. Although there is no shortage of electronic gaming coverage, whatever coverage is out there, outside of enthusiast coverage, the news media disproportionately focuses on certain types of electronic games or on partial information that does absolutely no justice to the interactive entertainment industry.Interactive entertainment, which includes computer and video games, has been subject to more regulation, censorship, and scrutiny than visual entertainment, which includes motion pictures and television programs, especially in the United States and Australia. At retail stores, according to Patricia Vance, the regulation of sales of electronic games that are rated M for Mature by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board is more than a 100 percent stricter than the regulation of sales of DVD’s of motion pictures that are rated R by the Motion Picture Association of America. There are no expressions of outrage of about minors gaining entry to theatrical screenings of R-rated motion pictures. The Australian censorship regime, the Australian Office of Film and Literature Classification, believes that there is a very special problem with electronic games.

Destructive political correctness, which is what this blog is mainly aimed against, is a threat to the video game industry. I disapprove of video game censorship or criticism on the basis of religious doctrines or false tenets of political correctness.

Video games are analogous to rock and roll. In the 1950’s, like electronic games today, rock and roll was a new work of art that was condemned for promoting aggressive behavior, thoughts, and affect among young people. Some rock and roll records were banned from the radio, and others had been censored. Politicians called for legislation against the reception of offending rock and roll records by post. But now, the Babyboomer generation who accepted rock and roll has grown up, and rock and roll has been considered a legitimate work of art. The same will go for electronic gaming by the 2030s.Most gamers (at least those I know) are good people and are very nice. The reason why this thread is entitled "Gamers are good people" is that it was influenced by an archived thread at Letting a video game experience decide what kind of person you will be is stupid and nonsensical. The video game players shall strike back against gamer criticism. Those stereotypes of video game players are so false, futile, useless, and evil. Any religious sect, including Jehovah's Witnesses, that restricts video games is theologically an authoritarian cult of Christianity, and here is a Web page about the strange beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses. We gamers will soon march and voice out against gamer criticism. Video game censors are evil people, and they shall be punished for the damage they did with the video game community.

Monday, October 13, 2008

My speculations on Star Wars in Blu-ray

When I bought my PS3 back on April 14, 2008, after Blu-ray defeated HD-DVD, I started buying motion pictures in Blu-ray format. However, Lucasfilm's Star Wars saga is not yet released in this HD format. The films would be remastered into perfect HD quality.

Here are my speculations concerning the Blu-ray version. For changes to Revenge of the Sith, for the portrayal of Luminara Unduli on Kashyyyk, Faye David should be replaced with the original actress Mary Oyaya. For the portrayal of Stass Allie, Nina Fallon and Tace Bayliss should be replaced with Lily Nyamwasa (who is found to be the canon portrayal of the character) [Nyamwasa was very disappointed about Fallon stealing her role in the film]. New Order 66 footage would be added, such as the deaths of Luminari Unduli on Kashyyyk and Barriss Offee on Felucia, scenes that were unshot for the theatrical version. The ending would be extended, adding Yoda's entry to Dagobah onto it.

For the original trilogy, further visual enhancement treatment by Lowry Digital would be done to make it look more in line with the prequel trilogy. Some newly shot footage, such as of planets that were previously covered in the prequel trilogy, might also be made. A New Hope would be the main focus for the enhancement. Luke's lightsaber in the Millennium Falcon scene, which appeared to be green, should be color-corrected to blue. The models would be replaced with computer graphics counterparts. The closing shot may have added footage of how Darth Vader survived the Battle of Yavin, resulting in footage of Coruscant. The original trilogy soundtracks would also be re-scored to sound in line with the prequel trilogy soundtracks. For Return of the Jedi, Kashyyyk would be added to the Victory Celebration footage. Aside from the Lowry Digital visual enhancement treatment, minor changes would be made.

There would also be a trivia track telling deeper into the story, and one telling the behind-the-scenes trivia, including changes from the previous versions of the films, references between the trilogies. Aside from English (as on the DVD), subtitles would also be available in French, Spanish, German, Japanese, Korean, and Chinese. New audio tracks aside from the ones included on the DVD would include the English Dolby TrueHD 7.1 channel, English Dolby TrueHD 5.1 channel, French 5.1, Spanish 5.1, and Japanese 5.1.

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Kim Kardashian gets thrown off of Dancing With the Stars

On the night of September 30, 2008, Kim Kardashian got voted off of Dancing With the Stars, thus arriving in 11th place. She had the second lowest score this week. She was partnered with Mark Ballas, who danced with last season's winner Kristi Yamaguchi. My hopes now go to Toni Braxton.

Kardashian was born on October 21, 1980, in Los Angeles, California, to an Armenian born father, Robert Kardashian (who is best known for being a defense attorney in the high-profile O.J. Simpson criminal trial) and a mother of Scottish and Dutch descent, Kris Jenner (née Houghton).

For the record, Dancing With the Stars is usually won by a man. Only two women won this show, who are Kelly Monaco and Kristi Yamaguchi. One woman, Melanie Brown (Scary Spice) of the Spice Girls was the runner-up of season 5.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

TZ Doctrine tenet #5: Men and women are equal but different, not equal and the same

The sexes are equal but different, not equal and the same.—Alan Barron

Men and women are different and depend on each other. It is unrealistic to resist so-called gender stereotypes. That includes violating Tedius Zanarukando doctrine tenet no. 1. Feminist dogma teaches that the genders are identical, but feminist dogma is inherently false. In a biological standpoint, the male anatomy and the female anatomy are different. The male human body is based on straight lines, whereas the female human is based on curves. The male brain and the female brain are also different. Both gender roles involve sacrifice. There are things that men are better in doing and things that women are better in doing. There are a few things that are wrong for women to do, like anything that violates TZ doctrine tenet no. 1. As this blog is aimed to do, feminism is based on lies, false allegations, made up statistics, hatred, etc. Feminism is designed to destroy femininity, thus too many women are brainwashed to imitate men, such as violating TZ doctrine tenet no. 1. It is designed to make men feel unhappy about their lives. It is designed to destroy marriage and families by creating docile and facile people and a system of "free love" where spouses come and go in a short time. It is designed to corrupt and debilitate society so that it will collapse. Feminism claims to be about equality, but in reality, it is designed to tilt the playing field in favor of the female sex. We must not go to a level of feminism where any male interest is assumed to be unwelcome and where men should deny their own responses, because that would be based on lies and is the dark side of feminism. Doing that is one-sided and would be a denial of our own nature and remove the joys of being a man. We cannot afford another three decades the same old-fashioned gender politics. We must not deny the joys of being a man or a woman. Feminism does not represent all women, nor is it in women's best interests.

Absolute gender equality is impossible to achieve. It is unrealistic to assert absolute gender equality. Men and women are equal but different, not equal and the same. Attempting to achieve absolute gender equality is like teaching that teaching and believing that men and women are equal and the same. Just because a few radical feminists think that something is offensive or degrading to women does not mean that the whole society has to change its way of doing things. Anything that is believed to be degrading to women is not inherently so. Being offended content that is believed to be degrading to women is learned (whether you are male or female) not built-in. It is impossible to live our lives without being offended by something, such as violence, profanity, pornography, drug abuse, use of alcohol or tobacco, religious content, whatever else is believed to be objectionable. We are bound to be offended by these anytime in our lives. We should deal with them and move on, not complain about them. Radical feminists do not represent all women in general. The clause "eroticism is degrading to women" is politically correct nonsense. The word "sexist" and the phrase "degrading to women" have feminist connotations.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

The origin of my username

I first adopted the username Tedius Zanarukando on September 1, 2002, at The username was inspired by Square Enix's Final Fantasy X. The full username is Eunes Decimus Tedius Regio Zanaruqandior. The name "Tedius" is derived from the name of Tidus, the protagonist of Final Fantasy X. It is also confused with the word tedious. That would imply that no one is romantically interested in me, that I have a unique and controversial opinion, or that I have had a bad reputation on some boards. "Zanarukando" meant that my favorite video game has been Final Fantasy X and is the kana spelling of "Zanarkand", implying that I would live in Zanarkand Ruins if I were in the Final Fantasy world. The kana spelling was chosen, because Japan has done a whole lot of great things for me, and many of my school supplies were made in Japan, and that I have somewhat been influenced by Japanese culture.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Obama chooses Biden as Vice-Presidential running mate

Tonight, on August 23, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama II has formally chosen Joseph Robinette "Joe" Biden as his Vice Presidential running mate. The choice was confirmed via text message at 2:45 a.m., Tedius Zanarukando time (Eastern Standard Time). Biden gave the green light on the Vice Presidential nomination in an interview on June 22, 2008. The New York Times reported that the strategy behind the choice reflected a desire to fill out the ticket with someone who has foreign policy and national security experience—and not to help the ticket win a swing state or to emphasize Obama's change message. If Obama is elected, Biden would be dubbed the first Roman Catholic U.S. Vice President and first U.S. Vice President in Delaware.

Biden was running for President of the United States before becoming Obama's Vice Presidential running mate. He declared his candidacy for U.S. President on January 31, 2007. He came in fourth place in the Democratic primary. It had been speculated that Biden would accept the position of Secretary of State because of his foreign policy experience and credentials. However, Biden has rejected the notion outright, saying "Under no administration will I accept the job of Secretary of State" and claimed to be focused only on the presidency. During the Iowa caucuses, Biden dropped out of the U.S. Presidential race on January 3, 2008, when over half of the precincts were tallied in which he only captured 1% of Iowa's delegates behind Barack Obama, John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, and Bill Richardson.

I am glad that Obama chose Biden and not Hillary as his Vice Presidential running mate. Hillary would have been a bad choice, because there would have been political dissent and civil war if she were chosen as Vice President. This is not the first the winner of a Democratic primary did not chose the primary runner-up as Vice Presidential running mate. In the 1992 Democratic Presidential election, William Jefferson Clinton, the 42th President of the United States, did not chose Democratic primary runner-up Jerry Brown as his Vice Presidential running mate, but chose Albert Arnold "Al" Gore, Jr., a potential candidate who did not run, instead.

Saturday, August 9, 2008

To feminist readers

This post is address to feminist readers of this blog. This blog is not meant to attack women in any way; it is actually to redeem women. The purpose of this blog is to analyze, inform, advise, and predict when it comes to political issues, including feminism and prudery. Feminism claims to promote only equality, but in reality, it promotes mistrust, division, and alienation between the genders. It is based on lies, false allegations, and dishonest statistics. It is designed to divide and destroy families and corrupt societies. It originates with the Illuminist endeavor to overthrow God and the natural order and impose on mankind a dictatorship ruled by the rich. We are trying to make the world a better place for everyone, thus eliminating legislation and political movements that are based on hate, lies, false allegations, dishonest statistics, and misleading scientific studies.


‘I compose this article for the enlightenment of feminist readers. Yes, I know you folks are out there, amongst the upwards of 60 million visitors who troop through here daily! I said I would throw you some scraps, but guess what? I think you deserve more than that, because I think you folks are special! So, chef Fidelbogen has cooked a full-course, sit-down meal for you guys, complete with all the fixin’s!

So let’s dig in! The most important thing to understand about the men’s movement is that it is a cross-section of humanity. This means that what humanity in its wide variety encompasses, the men’s movement likewise encompasses. It is like extracting a drop of water from a pond - stick this pond drop under a microscope and it will look identical to any other pond drop. The drop contains the pond in microcosm. So too, the men’s movement contains the human race. By that I mean that it contains the moral spectrum of human nature. The whole damned enchilada! The saints, the scoundrels, and everything in between - in the same proportions you are likely to encounter along the common roads of life.

Let us consider more closely the spectrum which the men’s movement encompasses. Men as a group are on the recieving end of feminist political fallout, therefore it is men as a group who are reacting to this fallout. And their reaction covers an enormously complex gamut of behaviors.

Pay close heed to the following: Not all of this behavior is politically conscious, and not all of it is admirable, rational or morally defensible. Men are simply reacting to the objective conditions that press upon them. Lashing out, you would say - or in some cases caving in. Over the years, feminist activism has injected into the world a number of innovations which have wrought to the disadvantage of male citizens, either directly or indirectly. And I don’t mean “loss of privilege”; I mean veritable objective injury in an absolute sense! Do you think the “R” in MRA stands for privilege? Think of this as input to a system - a system called “men”. What presently concerns us is the output which has occurred in consequence.

The feminist input to the male social ecology can fairly be described as ‘poison’. And poison, in whatever form it occurs, is a school for dysfunctional behavior. What else could it be? People who have been poisoned typically don’t behave well, do they? At the very least, they will show signs of sickness. Perhaps it is only bad manners. Or perhaps it takes a more dangerous form. But either way, you know that something has gotten into them.

The input into the system called ‘men’ has been poison. And the output from this system has likewise been…poison.

Poison in, poison out.

When you systematically stir up hate toward a targeted population, and systematically enact laws and policies that could deprive this targeted population of wealth, health, happiness, security, a good name and other needful things, then you can expect this targeted population to “act out” in various ways, in token of its displeasure.

Now the targeted population in this case amounts to half the human race, and that is no trifle. On the contrary, it is significant and should be treated as such. For one thing, the numbers are formidable. For another thing, the nature of what has been wrought introduces tortuous complexities into the world - like opening a can of hellworms.

Poison in, poison out.

The spectrum of male reaction corresponds to the variety of human types encompassed by the category men. Every man will act out according to his individual nature. However, take note: The pressures bearing down upon men are liable to have a cumulative warping effect. Specifically, such pressures will warp men en masse in a misogynistic direction. Men who are just a shade misogynistic to begin with will predictably become more so, but what’s concerning is that even men who are NOT misogynistic are apt to become just a shade so.

Call this the misogynistic shift. It occurs chiefly because, given the objective circumstances within their own lights, men rationally find less reason to think well of women. Women, for their own part, merely display their imperfect human nature because, under the press of moral challenge most of them fail to attain the level of heroic insight. They are soft, they are venal, they are naive, they are lazy, they are sheep-like, they are shortsighted, they are self-deceiving - simply put, neither better nor worse than men. But here, their human weakness makes them fall short in a specific manner that just happens to be male-detrimental. And men, particularly those whose lights afford them no better insight, take this unkindly.

Poison in, poison out.

However, not only have we got the misogynistic shift to deal with, but as originally stated we must also confront a variety of human types behaving in the many ways that human types naturally behave - which in the varied course of things is not always admirable, rational, morally defensible or politically conscious! Yes, a full spectrum of men reacting in a full spectrum of human ways to a pattern of damaging pressures applied toward men as a group. Here it is needful to understand, that without the initial action or input, the reactive behaviors would not be happening!

Think about that. Without the initial action or input, the reactive behaviors would not be happening!

Poison in, poison out.

A few years ago, the feminist thought-leader Germaine Greer made the following statement in a newspaper article:

“A kind of mad squeamishness prevents us from quantifying the nuisance value of maleness, possibly because if you actually tell men that they are damned nuisances, they are likely to behave even worse.”

Germaine Greer is bang on the money, for when you treat men the way Greer treats them in this statement, look out! One way or another, you’ll get what you deserve. When you abuse people, they are likely to behave even worse. Surprise, surprise!

Poison in, poison out.

I should add the obvious, that two can play at this game. Gender-sliming is a two-way street, and plenty of men have made their case, eloquently and plausibly, that women likewise are damned nuisances.

Yet there is something else, greater than the obvious, which I would draw to your attention. It is this: that even if the vile things feminists say about men were a little bit true, or possibly quite a bit true, it would generate no moral invalidation of the socio-political effect I am describing. There is no law against being a damned nuisance and nobody, not even a damned nuisance, enjoys being trodden on! If you make the world an unhealthy or unprofitable place for one half of the human species, I guarantee that your policy will turn around and BITE YOU ON THE ASS! Yes, that is how the world works, and if you don’t believe me just try it and see for yourself! Oh yes, we’ll see who’s a bloody nuisance all right! I am a quiet, laid-back person. A soft-spoken person. However, I am no pacifist. So please don’t force me to be the the kind of person you say I am!

Poison in, poison out.

In the end, it all comes to this: Male-bashing is not a wise idea. It is a lose-lose game any way you play it; a fool’s game in fact, and bound to have fool’s consequences. If male-bashing continues, look out! Trouble ahead! One way or another, across the board, men are in motion. There’s a foul wind blowing, and this is understandably setting them astir. You ought to be concerned; not on their account, but on your own! Given certain inputs, and given the archetypal patterns that hold sway within the realm of human occurrence, it may be predicted, on a statistical order of probability, that certain outputs will obtain.

Poison in, poison out.

The purpose of my counter-feminist agency is to analyze, inform, advise, and PREDICT. I make no threats, and I prescribe no toxic outcomes. I merely PREDICT what is likely to occur if certain policies and trajectories continue unabated. Others are free to believe or disbelieve whatever I might tell them; it is surely no task of mine to force their conscience one way or the other.

Men, as I have noted, are in a state of agitation owing to the toxic social conditions that feminist activism has been instrumental in generating. This agitation takes many forms, much of it ostensively linked to proximate causes only, with the connection to feminism not clearly seen. Indirect agencies are at work, which means that within the social ecology the larger workings of the domino chain are easily discounted or overlooked. But proximate causes have proximate causes of their own, and all of it trickles downhill from the points of input to the system.

And what happens when you input poison to a system? You know what I’m going to say: It poisons the entire system! And what happens when you shove people into a box? You know perfectly well what happens: They come out boxing! The scary part is that a lot of them are boxing blindly, and that means you had best stand clear! Considering how much smoke and dirt they’ve taken in their eyes, they don’t always rightly know what they’re pummeling!

No, their behavior isn’t always admirable, rational, morally defensible or politically conscious! The cross-section of humanity encompasses both men who have been rendered monstrous by horrendous suffering, and men who were admittedly never sterling critters in the first place! But it’s an ugly deal whichever way you cut it.

Poison in, poison out!

Oh yes, that reminds me: It is unspeakable folly to pipe the poison which flows from the output back into the input again. This adds injury to insult, and insult to injury, and ratchets up the cycle of political violence by effectively blaming the collective victim, meaning “men”. It is exactly like provoking somebody into hitting you, and then using that action as “evidence” against them. Feminism accumulates more bad karma this way than by any other means. What goes around comes around, and you guys are storing up a power of trouble for yourselves. Stop that! For your own sake!

Poison in, poison out!

Very well, I have given you the avian overview of a male population in motion - truly a men’s movement! Not all of this movement is politically conscious, but all of it is symptomatic of a malady, and continued application of the evils which brought about this malady will serve only to prolong and multiply the the trouble for all concerned.

I turn now to the question of expectations - what your side may expect, and what shall be expected of it. My purpose here is not to argue or debate. It is to inform - specifically to inform you of things that you would profit greatly from knowing. I purpose only to exhibit the objective state of present reality to feminist readers, so that the more intelligent among them will be guided in their thinking along lines which I have chosen.

The men’s movement is large. It numbers easily in the millions, especially if you factor in the many who are (as of yet) barely conscious of the movement’s existence, who operate in isolation, and want only the right spark to awaken them into a full-blown political consciousness. Yes, the sleeping dragon is big, and it sprawls clear across the planet. That is worth thinking about.

You must understand also, that the men’s movement is here for the duration. It will not go away. Moreover, if present evils persist, the movement will grow - stronger, larger, more intellectually sophisticated, more robustly integrated. The movement has naught to lose, and nowhere to go but up. Obstacles will pose no deterrent; it will flow over, around, or under any sort of roadblock it encounters. If temporarily held in check, the movement will gather force like water behind a dam.

Sitting on the men’s movement and squashing it will be to no avail. Hammer it into what form you wish - it will keep growing. Slander it, and it will spread. Leverage the power of the state against it, and it will intensify. Preach against it, and its charisma will climb the scale.

But then again, perhaps you are thinking that if you “chill out” and freeze the status quo exactly where it now stands without rocking the boat unnecessarily, then it will be possible to preserve the feminist hegemony in a holding pattern, with its subjugatory apparatus largely intact.

That would be a mistaken hope, for it ignores feminism’s inherently unstable character. Feminism, you see, is a perpetual revolution, and the nature of such a beast is to remain in motion, perpetually changing, perpetually posing new difficulties, perpetually churning up new dramas while it bores indefatigably into the future. In a certain sense, feminism has no existence separable from its disruption of what surrounds it. It is merely a force, like a dust-devil, and you cannot freeze a dust-devil; it will not hold a pose. And so it is with feminism. It is in vain to suppose that by some combination of consolidating your gains and not antagonizing the men’s movement needlessly, feminism will stay in the saddle and things will stay the same indefinitely. This would be futile because it is not the nature of a perpetual revolution to settle down, ever.

If feminism ever “freezes”, it will collapse and its power will evaporate. Feminism is not simply in motion, it IS motion!

Having understood the foregoing, you will see how it diminishes your options. The fact is that it leaves you only one choice: To keep moving and growing ad infinitum, just in order to keep existing.

So, if feminism wants to keep existing, it must continue to plough its customary furrow into the future, like an entropic vector that spreads degradation and poison into the social ecology, like a sinner who cannot let go of his sin without ceasing to be a sinner. That is how feminism has always operated. However, note my choice of words. This time I didn’t say “male social ecology”. I said just plain social ecology.

Yes, there is a male social ecology. Likewise, there is a female social ecology. But prior to both there is a social ecology plain and simple, a big round one that encompasses men and women alike from all directions and flows back and forth between them. Face it, men and women live on the same planet, their physiologies are overwhelmingly the same, they drink the same water and breathe the same air, they are indispensable to each other as a species, and their well-being is mutually interwoven - nay, fused together as one - in a multitude of ways that we needn’t ever hope to catalogue exhaustively.

Feminists love to trumpet the idea that women are the “ecological” sex, the ones who embody the virtues of relatedness, connectedness, interdependence, intuition, holistic feeling, pre-rationality, communalism, pacifism and the like. I’ll omit “women” from the discussion here, but I cannot miss the monumental irony that there is nothing ecological about feminism, which in its holistic praxis has been female-solipsistic through and through, to say nothing of supremacist. For all of its green rhetoric, the women’s movement has persistently acted oblivious to the sexually interdependent nature of human well-being.

Women’s well-being is not some 4X monster truck which you can drive anywhere you like, flattening the fences and flowerbeds, and running over men’s well-being as if no such thing even existed. No, you cannot wreck one half of a social ecology without repercussions upon the other half. Forgive me for belaboring the totally fucking obvious, but you cannot limit your strychnine to just half of a well.

And yes, that IS what feminism has been doing, all of these many years - poisoning the well of life from which we ALL must drink! That is my own conclusion, and that is the conclusion of most politically conscious members of the men’s movement all around the world. So…now you know exactly what manner of attitudinal tidal wave confronts you. This tidal wave is indisputably PRESENT on earth, and whether or not you agree with what this tidal wave is saying, the brute fact of its existence cannot be swept under the carpet, not can the inner sincerity of righteous conviction which it embodies.

Why am I telling you this? Because I think you need to know it. However, I am not telling you what to believe. Perish the thought! Your choice to believe or not believe is yours, and yours alone. But please understand that whichever choice you make, it will have consequences - a fact which bears sober consideration! Are we clear?

So as I stated earlier, you cannot simply consolidate your gains and stay the same, for if you undertook to do so, your power would melt away. And again as before, you have consequently only one choice: To keep moving and growing ad infinitum, just in order to satisfy the requirements of a perpetual revolution, and keep existing. But if you follow this course, you must keep doing what feminism has always done. And if you keep doing what feminism has always done, consequences will follow - consequences not only to men, and not only to the social ecology, but consequences to feminism in particular.

The main reason that feminism has gained so much ground over the years and reached its present status, is because it took a lot of people by surprise. It caught them napping. Doing nice things for women - who could possibly find fault with that? Nattering about some arcane legal pedantry like “rape is a crime of violence!” - sure, whatever…okay. Most men, including the present writer, were oblivious to the nine-mile snare that was gradually closing in around them. They didn’t foresee the coordinated master plan. They couldn’t possibly imagine the bearing of it all. Besides, they were too busy living their own lives.

But now things are changing. More and more men all the time are waking up to their objective political situation as men. They are bursting their mental shackles asunder, and learning to see the facts of the world flat-on, with their own eyes and with their newly reawakened native perceptions. Simply stated, they are becoming politically conscious.

And they are gaining critical mass.

This will have consequences for feminism. Once again, feminism is a perpetual revolution, and we know what that means, don’t we? A perpetual revolution is bound by FATE to keep performing as it has always done, simply in order to keep existing as a revolution. It is programmed to operate in this way, and it can do none other! But this will pile up a heap of difficulties for you, for the simple reason that the men’s movement is growing wise to your tricks, and furthermore, the men’s movement is just plain GROWING.

Let me put that another way: The men’s movement is getting SMARTER, and the men’s movement is getting BIGGER! You guys have pulled the wool in front of our eyes for too many years, but we’re not falling for it any more. For all of those years, YOU were growing while WE were sitting in the dark having shit fed to us. But now, WE are moving into the light, and WE are not eating your shit any more. And yes…we too are GROWING! At long last!

And that changes everything. The whole equation. The whole balance of power.


I am not telling you what to believe, I am just TELLING you!!!!

More and more men are seeing through the big lie that is the women’s movement! More and more men understand that feminism is unnatural! More and more men know that feminism is morally bankrupt!

And something else. More and more men realize that arguing with feminism is the biggest waste of time the world has ever known! Feminism is NOT a rational force with a rational plan; you CANNOT argue with feminism! You cannot “reason” with it!!!!

And that is why I, a man, am NOT arguing with you now!

No. I am simply TELLING you WHAT IS WHAT!!!

I am simply TELLING you where it’s AT!!!

I am simply TELLING you what TIME it is!!!

Suddenly, life has gotten very simple!






The men’s movement is growing, and I PREDICT that it will continue to grow. And I PREDICT that as time goes on, you will meet more and more men like myself who will NOT waste their energy arguing with feminism! These men will devote themselves more profitably to organizing, mobilizing, preaching, exhorting, blogging, leafleting, educating, recruiting and finally….taking direct action!

Those are my predictions. Believe them or not. It’s your choice.

You see, you have finally met your match. You got a big head start upon us, to the tune of 40 years, and that is why you are strong and we are weak. You have outflanked us and outgunned us, and yes, outwitted us! You have gained victory in a one-sided WAR only because the other side never even knew that any war was under way! But the times are changing!

I said that life has gotten simple. What I meant to say is that life has gotten simple for US, not for you. For too long, feminism has made life complicated for men, while offering women a host of moral shortcuts in the game of life. This state of affairs is set to implode upon your heads, and the implosion will come about both from the ineluctable logic contained in the onrush of events, and from the accumulated moral force of male consciousness.

For at long last you are facing a highly motivated and highly aware opposition, which is morally and intellectually armed to the teeth, and understands you to a ‘T’! That was not the case in years past, but is very much indeed the case now. That is why you have met your match.

And there is nothing you can do about it. Time is on our side. The men’s movement, on its collective mind level, is a rational force with clearly understood goals and a growing consensus of grassroots support. Feminism is merely a perpetual revolution, an automaton, operating from a base of female supremacism, female solipsism, cognitive fragmentation, and artificial life support from various institutions, divorced from the social ecology of the ecumenical human condition.

Being a perpetual revolution, you can do only do what you are programmed to do, mindlessly clanking along and churning up the world in your path according to the ever-shifting requirements of your revolutionary drive for power. But you will find that your programming, which served you well enough in years past when you faced no meaningful opposition, will no longer serve you under the altered conditions which are now arising in the world. It will be a new game, in which our side will advance steadily and overtake you. You have a 40-year advantage, but that gap will diminish. It is only a matter of time.

Life for you will become more difficult, more vexing, more taxing of your energy. The world will become more polarized - you against us - and this polarity will give you plenty of moral headaches! And still, the movement of men will continue to gain upon you in its slow, patient, orchestrated manner.

Expect your movement to fragment, or more accurately, to pull apart like taffy under the stress of socio-political tidal forces. Look around you, it is happening even now! As our movement and your movement come to loggerheads, your movement - being challenged at every trick and every turn of the cards - will find itself increasingly stymied as a perpetual revolution, unable to continue operating in that capacity. Deprived of this perpetually whirling, self-validating energy, your movement will be forced to think outside the box and to begin seeing itself objectively. Your followers will undergo cognitive dissonance to a growing degree, and many of them will commence back-peddling, soft-peddling, hedging, compromising, and finally…jumping ship altogether.

When feminism ceases to be a perpetually revolving, generating center, it will cease to be recognizably feminism at all. The entropy, once it is forbidden to flow outward, will instead flow inward. It will become centripetal; it will contract. And thereupon things will commence to unravel even within your very own gates. Being unable any longer to feed upon the world, your movement will auto-cannabilize. Your perpetual revolution, rather than chewing up the world, will turn inward and devour itself, owing to the force of counter-feminist pressure. The radius will grow smaller and smaller, and although the exposed core will burn more fiercely than ever, this too will boost the demise of it.

If all of this sounds like wild, mystical talk, I can assure you that plenty of brothermen in the movement - whose intelligence I respect and with whom I am right proud to be associated - will eventually read this, will comprehend in full what I am saying here, and will know exactly how to make their varied endeavors comport with the matter I have shared. Not that it makes any difference. I am only predicting the course of developments, and these will unfold with or without my poor support.

But you must not forget that your movement will reach a standoff with the movement of men in which all argument, all debate, all effort by either side to convince the other, will be futile. Equally futile, on that day, will be your customary strategy of appealing to male guilt. Remember that you are facing a growing body of people who will only laugh at you, and scoff at you, and throw feminist guilt right back in your face! And when they do this, how do you intend to answer it? You’ll not dissuade them, and if you try to suppress them by force - leveraging the power of law and the state - then the situation will grow steadily more volatile, and your own position inexorably more tenuous, along the line of the scenario which I have described.

The writing is on the wall. You have been weighed in the balance and found wanting. Your kingdom shall be demanded of you.

And the day will arrive when one choice only shall be given you.

On that day you shall have none other boot, than come to the table and NEGOTIATE, like it or not, with people such as we whom now you deem scarcely human. And the taste of this will be like unto bitter ashes in your mouth, but that is none of our doing..

Some of you might be wise to skip the negotiation part altogether, by the very simple expedient of changing sides. Defecting, I mean. Some of you, I know, are nearly to that point already. I would remind you, as I have myself written elsewhere, that nobody is born a feminist. At the end of the day, “feminist” is little else than a word which certain people have stuck to themselves, by personal choice, as an identifying label. Possibly you too have made the personal choice to stick this word to yourself, even though the strength of your conviction is not particularly strong. Well consider now that such a sticky trifle is easily unstuck, and if it would not distress you unduly you should peel that little goober off your sleeve, wad it up and chuck it over your shoulder with never a backward glance.

No, let me say state that again, with vehemence: FLEE! Flee from that valley! Flee as you would flee from the valley of Sodom and Gomorrah, and whatever you do, don’t look back!

But for you who remain in the valley, there will be no course possible but negotiation. If you keep doing what you’ve always done, the movement of men will grow progressively more forceful until it renders your existence prohibitively difficult, sapping your velocity finally to the point of standstill.

And if, having come to this point, perpetual revolution fails….then feminism fails - on the spot.

Either that, or negotiation starts.

And negotiation will address what, precisely? It will address the terms of feminism’s obsolescence. No more and no less.

It will be in your interest to negotiate, to step out of your briar patch and square up to the world. Posterity will judge you more kindly if you do.

If you undertake deceit in the manner of your negotiation, in hopes of perpetuating your revolution by subterfuge, then the vigilant eye of counter-feminist scrutiny will quickly make note of your devices, and your eventual reckoning will be the harsher for it.

We shall have, I trust, occasion to speak further of these things.’